Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 22:50:37 GMT -6
In times of global crisis, when credit is seen sometimes as a villain, sometimes as a springboard for economic growth, some comments are made about the influence that the effective Judiciary machine can exert, transcending the individual cases discussed.
Some justifications for high bank interest rates have been exposed, including insecurity in credit recovery or lack of guarantee. It is worth mentioning that credits secured by real estate have lower interest rates, as security in recovery, in the event of default, is complete, with a similar situation occurring with vehicles.
Perhaps due to the simplicity that emerges from the BTC Number Data topic, little has been said about the security in credit recovery that the Judiciary can provide. The relevance of Justice, needless to say, appears not only as a social appeaser in which antagonistic interests are resolved, but also, ultimately, as a fundamental piece for the economic success of a country.
It can be concluded without any effort, the greater the possibility of recovering a credit, the greater the security in granting a loan. Therefore, the strength of the Judiciary appears as a factor of utmost importance in contributing to lower interest rates and, therefore, to the necessary stimulus to the economy.
In this line of reasoning, before seeking to create new laws to strengthen legal means of credit recovery, it is necessary to honor existing mechanisms. The breadth of the topic requires that this brief reasoning highlights one of the means with effective potential to enable the success of many executions – the attachment of the legal entity's revenue.
As is known, the seizure of revenue is seen by some courts as an exceptional measure, granting it normally presupposes that the creditor has traveled a long and arduous path of frustration in search of his money (Resp nº , DJ //) . The debtor, at this time of execution, has been successful in dodging all the creditor's fair attacks. The latter, in turn, continues to embitter the default.
Some justifications for high bank interest rates have been exposed, including insecurity in credit recovery or lack of guarantee. It is worth mentioning that credits secured by real estate have lower interest rates, as security in recovery, in the event of default, is complete, with a similar situation occurring with vehicles.
Perhaps due to the simplicity that emerges from the BTC Number Data topic, little has been said about the security in credit recovery that the Judiciary can provide. The relevance of Justice, needless to say, appears not only as a social appeaser in which antagonistic interests are resolved, but also, ultimately, as a fundamental piece for the economic success of a country.
It can be concluded without any effort, the greater the possibility of recovering a credit, the greater the security in granting a loan. Therefore, the strength of the Judiciary appears as a factor of utmost importance in contributing to lower interest rates and, therefore, to the necessary stimulus to the economy.
In this line of reasoning, before seeking to create new laws to strengthen legal means of credit recovery, it is necessary to honor existing mechanisms. The breadth of the topic requires that this brief reasoning highlights one of the means with effective potential to enable the success of many executions – the attachment of the legal entity's revenue.
As is known, the seizure of revenue is seen by some courts as an exceptional measure, granting it normally presupposes that the creditor has traveled a long and arduous path of frustration in search of his money (Resp nº , DJ //) . The debtor, at this time of execution, has been successful in dodging all the creditor's fair attacks. The latter, in turn, continues to embitter the default.